(especially systematic reviews ) published in reputable medical journals ; academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant fields and from respected publishers; and guidelines or position statements from national or international expert bodies. Symposia and supplements to academic journals are commonly sponsored by industry groups with a financial interest in the outcome of the research reported. Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM (3rd.). Note that journals that have changed names or ceased publication will not be "currently" indexed on medline, but their indexing status, when they were being published, can be viewed under other headings on that same page. If independent sources discussing a medical subject are of low quality, then it is likely that the subject itself is not notable enough to have its own article or relevant for mention in other articles.
Medical textbooks published by academic publishers are often excellent secondary sources. For example, a page that is tagged as "Comment" or "Letter" is a non-peer-reviewed letter to the editor. If no high-quality source exists for a controversial statement it is best to leave it out; this is not bias. "A practical guide to assigning levels of evidence". Guidelines do not always correspond to best evidence, but instead of omitting them, reference the scientific literature and explain how it may differ from the guidelines. 17 Indications that an article was published in a supplement may be fairly subtle; for instance, a letter "s" added to a page number, 18 or "Suppl." in a reference. (See: Sokal affair.) Wikipedia policies on the neutral point of view and not publishing original research demand that we present prevailing medical or scientific consensus, which can be found in recent, authoritative review articles, in statements and practice guidelines issued. Assess evidence quality edit When writing about treatment efficacy, knowledge about the quality of the evidence helps distinguish between minor and major views, determine due weight, and identify accepted evidence-based information. Some high-quality journals, such as jama, publish a few freely readable articles even though most are not free. 34 Consequently, they are usually poor sources and should always be used with caution, never used to support surprising claims, and carefully identified in the text as preliminary work.
Real prostate massage real escorte oslo - Wikipedia :Identifying reliable
|Webcam chat porn eskorte i trondheim
|Sexsider på nett sex massage escort
|New dating sites eskorte drammen
|real prostate massage real escorte oslo
Young busty teen tries a big cock inside her tight pussy - Eva Elfie.
A few, such as Evidence-based Dentistry ( issn publish third-party summaries of reviews and guidelines published elsewhere. If conclusions are worth mentioning (such as large randomized clinical trials with surprising results they should be described appropriately as from a single study: "A large, NIH-funded study published in 2010 found that selenium and Vitamin E supplements, separately. If there is consensus on an article that a certain source should be omitted for bias, it may be excluded. A aa aaa aaaa aaacn aaah aaai aaas aab aabb aac aacc aace aachen aacom aacs aacsb aad aadvantage aae aaf aafp aag aah aai aaj aal aalborg aalib aaliyah aall aalto aam aamc aamco aami aamir. It can also be helpful to perform a plain web search rather than one of scholarly articles only. Using small-scale, single studies makes for weak evidence, and allows for cherry picking of data.
One way to contribute with a COI is to post on talk-pages, suggesting edits. The New England Journal of Medicine. Speculative proposals and early-stage research should not be cited to imply wide acceptance. How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-based Medicine (3rd.). The classification scheme includes about 70 types of documents. A good strategy for avoiding sole reliance on search engines is to find strikkeoppskrifter dame chat service
a few recent high-quality sources and follow their citations to see what the search engine missed. This makes using up-to-date books even more important. Greenhalgh T (July 1997). Government publications, such as the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Press releases, newsletters, advocacy and self-help publications, blogs and other websites, and other sources contain a wide range of biomedical information ranging from factual to fraudulent, with a high percentage being of low quality. Primary publications describe novel research for the first time, while review articles summarize and integrate a topic of research into an overall view. A news article should therefore not be used as a sole source for a medical fact or figure. "How we rate stories". Sinai School of Medicine. For example, one may legitimately be an authority on a certain topic a volunteer who reads the talk-page will not always have the knowledge to assess the sources properly. Searching for sources edit Search engines are commonly used to find biomedical sources. "How to critically appraise an article". Experiments and studies can produce flawed results or even fall victim to deliberate fraud (e.g. Retrieved 17 November 2012. Journals may specialize in particular article types.